Measuring Software Dependability by Robustness Benchmarking

نویسندگان

  • Arup Mukherjee
  • Daniel P. Siewiorek
چکیده

Inability to identify weaknesses or to quantify advancements in software system robustness frequently hinders the development of robust software systems. Efforts have been made to develop benchmarks of software robustness to address this problem, but they all suffer from significant shortcomings. This paper presents the various features that are desirable in a benchmark of system robustness, and evaluates some existing benchmarks according to these features. A new hierarchically structured approach to building robustness benchmarks, which overcomes many deficiencies of past efforts, is also presented. This approach has been applied to building a hierarchically structured benchmark that tests part of the Unix file and virtual memory systems. The resultant benchmark has successfully been used to identify new response class stuctures that were not detected in a similar situation by other less organized techniques. Index Terms — system reliability, software dependability, robustness benchmarking, test suite organization, object-oriented benchmarks, software validation, extensible benchmarks.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing Operating Systems Using Robustness Benchmarks

When creating mission-critical distributed systems using off-the-shelf components, it is important to assess the dependability of not only the hardware, but the software as well. This paper proposes a way to test operating system dependability. The concept of response regions is presented as a way to visualize erroneous system behavior and gain insight into failure mechanisms. A 5-point “CRASH”...

متن کامل

Workshop on Dependability Benchmarking

Classical features such as raw performance and functionality have long driven the computer industry to improve their products. But now, dependability and maintainability are seen as equally important. While there are relatively straightforward ways to evaluate and compare performance and functionality of different systems or components, the evaluation of dependability and maintainability featur...

متن کامل

What’s Wrong With Fault Injection As A Benchmarking Tool?

This paper attempts to solidify the technical issues involved in the long-standing debate about the representativeness of fault injection as a tool for measuring the dependability of general-purpose software systems. While direct fault injection seems appropriate for evaluating fault tolerant computers, most current software systems are not designed in a way that makes injection of faults direc...

متن کامل

What’s Wrong With Fault Injection As A Benchmarking Tool?

This paper attempts to solidify the technical issues involved in the long-standing debate about the representativeness of fault injection as a tool for measuring the dependability of general-purpose software systems. While direct fault injection seems appropriate for evaluating fault tolerant computers, most current software systems are not designed in a way that makes injection of faults direc...

متن کامل

Workshop On Dependability Benchmarking 2002

Assessing the quality of service of a computer system is a difficult task. A lot of work has been conducted on evaluating quality of service attributes like performance, robustness, and dependability. Two approaches used for evaluating performance and robustness are modeling and benchmarking. For evaluating dependability, modeling can be used either alone or combined with fault injection [Sie92...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • IEEE Trans. Software Eng.

دوره 23  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997